At Artesane Studio, scholarly rigor and ethical responsibility define the entire editorial process. The magazine operates according to principles of transparency, intellectual accountability, and methodological precision. Each submission is evaluated within this framework to ensure conceptual coherence, linguistic accuracy, and academic integrity. Therefore, this policy is designed to prevent the inclusion of fabricated terminology, AI-hallucinated bibliographic references, distorted historical narratives, or false attributions, thereby safeguarding the reliability and scholarly credibility of the publication.
Each manuscript undergoes a preliminary assessment to determine its alignment with the publication's scope, thematic orientation, and philosophical commitments. Submissions must demonstrate theoretical unity and reflect the interdisciplinary depth that defines the magazine.
Peer Review
- All manuscripts are subject to a peer-review process, generally conducted through an invitational model. Reviewers are selected on the basis of subject expertise and thematic relevance. When appropriate, a double-blind procedure may be implemented.
- Each submission is ordinarily evaluated by at least two independent scholars, often representing different disciplines in order to reflect the transdisciplinary character of the journal. Reviewers are members of the Academic Peer Review Board and include internationally recognized philosophers, literary scholars, theologians, and cultural critics.
- Articles are assessed according to the following criteria: i). originality of argument, ii). epistemic consequence, iii). methodological soundness, and iv). bibliographic integrity. The review process is dialogical and constructive, aimed not merely at evaluation but at strengthening the intellectual contribution of the work.
Revision
- Authors are invited to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewer feedback. Suggested modifications may include clarifying conceptual arguments, restructuring complex sections, refining titles, or consolidate bibliographic foundations. Revisions are adapted to the specific submission and implemented in a manner that preserves the author's voice while enhancing clarity and analytical precision.
Final Approval
- The final stage consists of an editorial review conducted by the magazine's academic coordinators and external advisors. This phase ensures internal consistency, integration of reviewer recommendations, and compliance with the scholarly standards.
Structural requirements
- The magazine does not accept essays or poems that are entirely generated by artificial intelligence. At least 80 percent of the intellectual contribution must originate from the author. Artificial intelligence tools may be used ethically and in a limited capacity — no more than 20 percent of the final text — and exclusively for supportive purposes such as linguistic refinement, structural organization, or proofreading.
- There is no fixed page limit. Authors may develop their work to the extent required by the complexity of the subject; however, length must be justified by analytical depth and argumentative relevance rather than redundancy.
- Submissions must demonstrate linguistic accuracy at both the grammatical and orthographic levels.
- Manuscripts must be written in English or Romanian and must not have been previously published.
- Translations (for example, into French, Italian, or Spanish) are also welcome, provided they are accompanied by a copy of the original text.
Languages
The Academic Peer Review Board
The Peer-review Team serves as a central guarantor of intellectual quality and ethical standards. This evaluative model ensures that interdisciplinary work is examined through multiple critical perspectives. For further information regarding the Board's areas of expertise and recent academic contributions, please consult the dedicated section: [Link to Board].